TATA tries to silence critics, takes Greenpeace to
court

Delhi, India, Claiming defamation and trademark infringement, TATA Sons has
filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace in the Delhi High Court, asking for Rs.
10 crore in damages. The case is listed for hearing on July 27. Greenpeace
has been an outspoken critic of the Dhamra Port Project, being co-developed
by TATA Steel, on account of the threat it poses to nearby protected areas
and endangered species, including the olive ridley turtle.

The lawsuit filed by TATA is an act to silence its critics. TATAs threat
of legal action is a desperate attempt to stifle the growing criticism over
their port project, and divert attention from the real issue of the impact
it will have on a biodiversity rich area. Public opinion is on the side of
the turtles over 150,000 Indians, leading scientists and turtle
biologists(1), politicians and national NGOs(2) have come out against the
port. By first ignoring and now trying to silence these voices, TATA is
showing that it cares only about its bottom line, and not the environment,
said Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace India.

The Dhamra port has been opposed by researchers and wildlife groups since it
was first proposed in the 1990s, on account of its proximity to the
Bhitarkanika and Gahirmatha protected areas. Bhitarkanika is Indias second
largest mangrove forest and the last stronghold of the saltwater crocodile,
while Gahirmatha is one of the worlds largest nesting grounds for the
endangered olive ridley sea turtle. The port is less than 5 km from
Bhitarkanika National Park and less than 15 km from the mass nesting beaches
at Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary.

The Dhamra port is scheduled to be operational within a few weeks, despite
unresolved legal issues. Government documents obtained under the Right to
Information Act show that the port is in violation of the Forest
Conservation Act, 1980. Acting on these documents, prominent
conservationists have challenged the project in the Supreme Court(3), where
the case is currently pending. Earlier this year, over 20 national
politicians (4) wrote to Union Minister for Environment and Forests Jairam
Ramesh asking him to take action on this issue; the Minister has thus far
refused to take a public stand.

Greenpeace believes in non-violent creative confrontation and our Turtle
vs TATA game is a result of that belief. The game has become very popular
in the online world since its launch, even generating media articles(5)
about creative activism, says Avijit Michael, Greenpeace Online Campaigner.
Over 150,000 people have supported the campaign against the Dhamra port
that figure should be respected and answered to, he added.

Over 300 ports are planned for the coast of mainland India. To ensure that
mistakes like Dhamra are not repeated, Greenpeace is asking Environment
Minister Jairam Ramesh to strengthen the Coastal Regulation Zone
notification to exclude new ports or expansion of old ones within 25 km. of
ecologically sensitive (CRZI) areas.

*Notes to Editor*
1. http://greenpeace.in/turtle/wp-content/pdfs/scientist-statement.pdf
2. http://greenpeace.in/turtle/wp-content/pdfs/letter-to-ratan-tata-wpsi.pdf
3. http://greenpeace.in/turtle/docs/moef-dhamra-fca-violation-june-12-2009
4. Business Standard
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/green-lobby-seeks-action-against-dhamra-port/395270/
5. Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/06/29/campaign-20-turtle-vs-tata-the-game/

*Vision, video, photos, report information*

1. Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace India +91 9980199380
ashish.fernan...@greenpeace.org<http://in.mc950.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ashish.fernan...@greenpeace.org>
2.
Hozefa Merchant, Media Officer,
Greenpeace India +91 9819592410
hozefa.merch...@greenpeace.org<http://in.mc950.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hozefa.merch...@greenpeace.org>

*'Social movements die if they do not repeatedly reinvent themselves'* Peter
Waterman

B 6 Abhilasha Apts - 11 A Purulea Rd. - P.O. Ranchi Jharkhand 834001= INDIA
Tel/fax: (O) +91 651 2532035 / 2531874 / 2532104 - Cell +91(India)
9431185072
www.firstpeoplesfirst.in www.birsa.in www.adhikar.in



------------------------------------

Visit our website: http://www.cgnet.in
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chhattisgarh-net/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chhattisgarh-net/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
chhattisgarh-net-dig...@yahoogroups.com<http://in.mc950.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=chhattisgarh-net-dig...@yahoogroups.com>

    
chhattisgarh-net-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com<http://in.mc950.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=chhattisgarh-net-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com>

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    
chhattisgarh-net-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com<http://in.mc950.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=chhattisgarh-net-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com>

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

-- 
Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist

"After a war, the silencing of arms is not enough. Peace means respecting
all rights. You can’t respect one of them and violate the others. When a
society doesn’t respect the rights of its citizens, it undermines peace and
leads it back to war.”
-- Maria Julia Hernandez


www.otherindia.org
www.binayaksen.net
www.phm-india.org
www.phmovement.org
www.ifhhro.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movem...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to