*What Ails National Integration Council?*


*Ram Puniyani*



The meeting of National Integration Council (NIC) on 23rd September (2013)
was a damp squib. Held in the aftermath of Muzaffarnagar violence and in
the times when the next Parliamentary elections are on the horizon, one
expected some concrete proposals and actions which Government could have
discussed and brought in as a voluntary code for all to follow. The major
point which was highlighted was the role of social media in exaggerating
the violence. The underlying cause of the role of media was not much
highlighted. Even before the social media, communal violence was getting
ignited by the word of mouth rumors or via the print media uncritically
carrying the rumors. Social media is a medium in the hands of those who use
it. It is not the actor. The actors are those who are adept to using this
in a negative way, like the BJP MLA who uploaded a provocative video clip
with a deliberate purpose in Muzaffarnagar to ignite the brute passions.
The forces letting it happen are those who called the Mahapanchyat on an
issue which is a law and order problem and should have been dealt with like
that only. Those bringing together armed participants in a panchayat are
the real players. The real players are those who despite knowing that the
small incident may get blown up do not take the action in proper time.



The tale of Muzaffarnagar tragedy could have been a big lesson for to those
attending the meeting, those committed to national integration in the real
sense. Surely many do not take NIC seriously. It became clear as many a
Chief Ministers did not participate in the meeting, only one CM from BJP
ruled state attended it. The Prime Ministerial aspirant, Modi, avoided it.
Many a speakers did hint at the role of BJP family in instigating the
violence, in a language which is subtle but clear. What could NIC have
resolved? Surely NIC as a body has to understand that the communal violence
flares up as the majority of society has biases against the minorities. We
have to know that administration and police machinery acts on biases and
many a political formations calculate the electoral benefits before acting
one way or the other. As such so far NIC has not been able to play the role
which was envisaged for it.



To begin with the NIC was formed in 1961, in the aftermath of Jabalpur
violence. Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister of the country
was very shaken by the communal violence in Jabalpur and decided to form
this council to combat the evils of Communalism, casteism and regionalism.
It was meant to be a broad forum with representation from all political
parties, Chief Ministers, Central Cabinet ministers and representatives
from the civil society. It was not much in news most of the times. Two
major points one remembers regarding the council are, one when Kalyan Singh
the UP Chief Minister, then belonging to BJP, promised to the Council that
the Babri Masjid will be protected at all the cost. Same Kalyan Singh later
took pride in being part of the process of demolition of the mosque.



Later, when BJP led NDA came to power and ruled the country for six years
the NIC was not constituted at all. The signal was that the BJP does not
care for national integration as it believes in the Hindu Rashtra and not
in secular democratic India. That apart even in the present scheme of
things NIC has a very limited advisory role to play. During the previous
UPA I regime, the NIC met only twice. During UPA II also NIC has met only
twice. All said and done it is a national forum which can give vent to the
voice of those who are victims of communalism in one form or the other and
deliberate on solutions to this problem dogging our nation.



By its very norm the council has to have all the Chief ministers as the
member of NIC. So naturally, Narendra Modi, the one who presided over
Gujarat carnage, is also the member of the same. One recalls that during
UPA I, in the first meeting of NIC, he was probably the only one who
managed to make his presence felt in the media, with his claim that
minorities are safe in Gujarat! This time he avoided attending it
altogether.



In the present meeting the positive thing which happened, but was not
reported by the mainstream media, was the presentation of civil society
member John Dayal who called for the Communal and Targeted violence bill to
be introduced. In the last meeting when the bill was tabled in the meeting
there was furor and Government; sort of retreated. This time around The
Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde stated that the government would soon
bring an anti-communal violence bill. One recalls that National Advisory
Council has submitted a draft of the bill. The focus of the bill is the
accountability of the political, administrative and police personnel. They
should be held accountable for the violence and action should be taken
against the erring office bearers and officials.



If this is carried through it will be a great achievement on the part of
the NIC. There are many steps which this Government can initiate like using
television for propagating the values of freedom movement, the values of
Indian Constitution and the ethos of harmony. The diversity of Indian
society and the pluralism of our Constitution need to be brought to the
people once again. How people of different religions participated in
India’s freedom movement, how people of different religions contributed to
Indian culture and how the people of different religions followed Bhakti
and Sufi saints needs to be highlighted through our media. Unfortunately a
big chunk of media is carrying historical serials which provoke hatred
rather than amity.



This Government can initiate the training of police and bureaucrats in the
values of India’s pluralism. To make NIC meaningful it needs to come out
from the slumber of inactivity and the mass hysteria of communalism to lay
the bridges between different religious communities.  NIC in the least can
deliberate on the in-depth causes which have led to the present sorry state
of things, whereas the meetings of NIC have become a mere formality. By and
large it has yielded no result so far. Will the Government take up the
process of bringing in communal violence prevention bill at least now, as
soon as possible? This present sorry plight has to be overcome and real
national integration brought in.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movement@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to