Jeff Squyres wrote: > I notice that > > shell$ hwloc-bind > > (i.e., invoking hwloc-bind with no arguments) > > returns an exit status of 0. Shouldn't it return non-zero? I'd think it was > an error if you didn't give hwloc-bind anything to do. For example, we > wouldn't want a script with something like this: > > hwloc-bind $actions_to_do > > to return 0 if $actions_to_do was mistakenly empty. > > Right? >
Yeah maybe