Jeff Squyres, le Thu 17 Dec 2009 07:51:34 -0500, a écrit : > > > Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the > > > embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded > > > test > > > effectively needs a full hwloc tarball to compile against. > > > > Ok, but you could also just run make check in the standalone version > > already. > > Yes, and you still can (and it works). But it doesn't call the embedded test > because of the reasons I mentioned. Note, too, that the "make check" in the > top-level directory does not test embedded functionality; that's why I > created a specific test for it.
Ok, sure. I just mean it could have been good to run make check before commiting the signed/unsigned change. Samuel
