On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 21:49, Jeff Squyres <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>
>> > Same question again :)
>>
>> I suspect, I can't propose API changes after that, right? ;-)
>
> It would be good, yes. :-)
>
> Have you had a good look around hwloc? I.e., do you have a feel for whether
> you will be suggesting any more API changes?
Only a cursory one and mostly inside the linux backend. Here are some
thoughts: Thats more a personal favor, but anyway: In case of the
binary cpuset operations I find the '<res> = <arg1> op <arg2>' style
more flexible, than the current '<arg1> op= <arg2>' style. I would
also rename hwloc_cpuset_clearset() to hwloc_cpuset_andnotset(), so it
fits to the _{or,and,xor,not}set naming style (i.e. they are named
after the bit operation).
I myself don't expect any API changes from me anymore.
Bert
