On Mar 31, 2010, at 6:03 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Brice Goglin, le Wed 31 Mar 2010 11:37:17 +0200, a écrit : > > We might need to replace some occurences of "logical processor" in the > > doc with "processing unit". Or use both from time to time to make it > > clear that it's very similar (and explain the difference somewhere). > > I'd say keep it in the glossary section of the documentation, to make it > clear that by PU we mean "logical processor", and not "core".
Perfect. Let's do it. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
