On Feb 17, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I am waiting for this troll to settle down before pushing some related > changes (add a (cpubind?) support flag and a hwloc-bind option). > I agree that "last" is better than "current". And I agree that > "lastcpuexec" isn't perfect, but I didn't see anything better so far :)
hwloc_get_heisenbind() (you can't know your binding and location at the same time -- nyuk nyuk) hwloc_get_last_cpu_location() hwloc_get_last_cpu_locality() hwloc_get_last_known_cpuexec() hwloc_get_last_seen_cpuexec() hwloc_get_instant_cpuexec() hwloc_get_cpuexec_now() hwloc_get_my_last_cpuexec() ...? -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
