On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: >> - I don't know where we ended up in the other thread: do we want JSON or no? >> If we can parse it easily without an external dependency, then I think it's >> worthwhile. > > I stopped working on JSON this to see where the idea of reimplementing > our own XML parser would go.
Beyond your prior emails on this, any further thoughts? Especially if we restrict to ASCII-only? >> - OTOH, JSON would be a new feature, and probably shouldn't be introduced >> after a x.y.0 release. > > Yeah but it's a new backend, it's supposed to not touch anything in the > core and to not break other backends. K, fair enough. >> - I could bump OMPI to v1.3, but it's not as mature as 1.2.x, which just >> makes me a little nervous (the goal for the hwloc stuff is to bring it in >> late in the OMPI v1.5 series... but I've already got some feedback that >> there might be resistance to what we're proposing to use hwloc for in OMPI, >> so we'll see :-) ). > > Agreed, v1.3 is too young for OMPI. I am not sure many people already > tried v1.3rc1. I wouldn't put it in OMPI before hwloc 1.3.1. K. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
