Samuel Thibault, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:43:56 +0100, a écrit : > Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit : > > On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit : > > >>Option #4: > > >> CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077' > > >>Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0. > > >That still looks dangerous to me: we don't know whatever warning > > >might be added in the future. I'd rather add -qhalt=e only for the > > >sched_setaffinity test. > > > > I don't recommend adding -qsuppress automatically, just documenting it for > > users that need xlc-8 or xlc-9. > > I'm not actually talking about the -qsuppress, but about still using > -qhalt=e, which might make a lot more other warnings fatal.
(and I mean that adding just one -qsuppress is not enough, other warnings could arise, and then we'd need more -qsuppress, but we don't know yet which, etc.) Samuel
