On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> I don't think so. I am planning to only update the regression testing > for v1.7 as well. K. > BUT what if the stable OMPI 1.6 needs a hwloc fix? Should we keep the > hwloc v1.5 branch open? Errrr... let's cross that bridge when/if we need to. :-) >> 2. With SVN, adding the r number in the tarball version was sufficient to >> observe ordering of the tarballs. For example: >> [snip] >> I think that this is ok (other projects use this "git describe" kind of >> behavior for their nightly snapshots), but this is a change from what we >> used to do, so I wanted to call it out specifically. >> >> Are you guys ok with this? > > That'll work for me. > > What about when we are actually doing a release where we don't want a > git-describe suffix ? Does the above apply to contrib/make_dist_tarball > in general? Or only to when it runs at night (in make dist only?) ? There are actually 2 scripts: contrib/dist/make_dist_tarball contrib/nightly/make_snapshot_tarball (currently called create_tarball.sh) The former works largely as it did before: it'll make hwloc-<VERSION file data>.tar.*. The latter is being heavily updated to basically use "git describe". -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
