On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate). > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and > give us credentials. Done. > The only important one is "cuda". > Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are > obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to > revive them. I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see what he says. I don't see a valarray branch in SVN -- where is that? > Looks like we're also missing stable branches v0.9, v1.0 and v1.1 for > some reason. #$@%@#%$#@$% I'm re-running the svn->git conversion on my laptop to see if I can figure out why these branches didn't make it over. In the worst case, we can re-seed the hwloc git repo because nothing tremendously important has happened since the conversion (we can just replay the script update commits -- it'll be a little painful, but do-able). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/