Le 13/03/2012 17:04, Hartmut Kaiser a écrit : >>> But the problems I was seeing were not MSVC specific. It's a >>> proliferation of arcane (non-POSIX) function use (like strcasecmp, >>> etc.) missing use of HAVE_UNISTD_H, HAVE_STRINGS_H to wrap >>> non-standard headers, unsafe mixing of >>> int32<->int64 data types, reliance on int (and other types) having a >>> certain bit-size, totally unsafe shift operations, wide use of >>> (non-C-standard) gcc extensions, etc. Should I go on? > More investigation shows that the code currently assumes group (and > processor) masks to be 32 bit, which is not true on 64 bit systems.
No. What it assumes is that you have a sane compiler where ulong is not 32bits on 64bits systems :) Brice