Hello I don't see any significant change in v1.11 regarding embedding, especially with respect to CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES.
Does v1.10 work when running autogen with the same versions of automake/libtool/autoconf? I am using 1.14.1/2.4.2/2.69 here. If you enter hwloc-1.11.0/tests/embedded, does "./run-embedded-tests.sh ../../hwloc-1.11.0.tar.gz" fail? After running autogen.sh, I get hwloc-1.11.0/Makefile.in without the line CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES = @CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES@ here. Can you look at https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/blob/v1.11/tests/embedded/configure.ac and see if you're missing something from there? Maybe we forgot to specify that some other configure lines are required. Brice Le 07/07/2015 20:28, D'Alessandro, Luke K a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I’ve recently tried to update our embedded hwloc from 1.10.0 to 1.11.0 and > I’m running into an issue. I essentially have: > > AS_IF([…], > [HWLOC_SETUP_CORE([contrib/hwloc-1.11.0], […], [AC_MSG_WARN(…)], [1])]) > > HWLOC_DO_AM_CONDITIONALS > > I have `ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I config -I contrib/hwloc-1.11.0/config` in the > top level Makefile.am. > > It appears that, for whatever reason, (at least) @CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES@ > isn’t being replaced in Makefile.in. > > $ make > Making all in contrib > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ldalessa/obj/test/contrib' > Makefile:755: warning: overriding commands for target `check-recursive' > Makefile:487: warning: ignoring old commands for target `check-recursive' > Making all in hwloc-1.11.0 > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ldalessa/obj/test/contrib/hwloc-1.11.0' > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `@CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES@', needed by > `/u/ldalessa/src/contrib/hwloc-1.11.0/Makefile.in'. Stop. > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ldalessa/obj/test/contrib/hwloc-1.11.0' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ldalessa/obj/test/contrib' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > $ > > I am by no means an AC/AM expert. > > Am I likely doing something obviously wrong? > > Has the embedding protocol changed since the 1.10 series? > > Thanks, > Luke > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users > Searchable archives: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-users/2015/07/1183.php