Hello Pavan I am planning to fix this in 2.1 (to be released before summer). I'll backport the trivial pieces to 2.0.x too.
Do you care about a specific value passed to -Wstack-usage=X? or do you just want to avoid dynamic/unbounded allocs on the stack? Brice Le 18/03/2019 à 15:04, Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users a écrit : > Brice, all, > > Any update on this? Are you guys planning on fixing these? > > -- Pavan > >> On Feb 25, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Balaji, Pavan via hwloc-users >> <hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Brice, >> >>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 2:27 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: >>> Are you sure you're not passing -Wstack-usage? My Ubuntu 18.04 with >>> latest gcc-7 (7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) doesn't show any of those warnings. >> Yes, you are right, -Wstack-usage was explicitly added too. Sorry, I missed >> the fact that it wasn't default in -Wall. >> >>> It looks like all these warnings are caused by C99 variable-length >>> arrays (except 2 that I don't understand). I know the kernel devs >>> stopped using VLA recently, and it looks like C11 made them optional. >>> But are we really supposed to stop using VLA already? >> They are optional, which means we cannot assume them for portability >> reasons. FWIW, we have made the rest of mpich stack-usage clean. >> >> -- Pavan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hwloc-users mailing list >> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org >> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users _______________________________________________ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
