Yeah, but it limits how many samples you can have.
Dustin Zahn
----- Original Message -----
From: Olaf Molenveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Recomendations?


> i found the quality of the samples and the outputs good enough...i believe
> it's 32 KHz.....
>
> Olaf
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dustin Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Olaf Molenveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Recomendations?
>
>
> > Electribe ES-1 sucks ass man. The sampling rate is horrible.
> > Dustin Zahn
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Olaf Molenveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 10:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: Recomendations?
> >
> >
> > > What??? buy an RM1x and an electribe ES-1
> > >
> > > Olaf
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 5:08 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Recomendations?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Just buy a mpc2000xl, rm1x, and akai s6000 then you are set.
> > > >
> > > > Dustin Zahn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well, I have owned both a MPC2000 and a RM1x. The 2000 is a great
> > > machine,
> > > > > but it's not worth the money at all.  It doesn't come with any
> effects
> > > and
> > > > > the only editing you can do is cutting, pasting, and envelope
> > > modulation.
> > > > > For how much money it costs, you can buy a nice Yamaha A3000 or
4000
> > > which
> > > > > has double the sampling time, better editing capabilities, and 50
to
> > 90
> > > > > effects/filters.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dustin Zahn
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Sarah Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 7:16 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: Recomendations?
> > > > >
> > > > > > The MPC is a sequencer with a sampler built in. The RM1x is a
> > > sequencer
> > > > > with
> > > > > > a synth built in. The MPC has more MIDI outs. The MPC has nicer
> pads
> > > for
> > > > > > real-time drum programming. The RM1x has better grid and groove
> > > editing
> > > > > > features. From what I've seen, both are good. The RM1x is much
> > > cheaper,
> > > > > > however, and if you already have a sampler, it might make more
> > > economic
> > > > > > sense. I checked both out, and went for the RM1x because I
> preferred
> > > the
> > > > > way
> > > > > > that its drum programming works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sarah
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: samuel C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: 03 July 2000 08:05
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Recomendations?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What about Akai MPC2000xl???
> > > > > > > is in any way similar to RMX???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > apart from the price, what differences (mainly) those two
> units??
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _saM_
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > to clarify, I don't mind using an external MIDI keyboard to
> > write
> > > > > chords
> > > > > > > > with, and I've never really gotten into auto-chords on any
of
> my
> > > gear.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's just that for drum programming and for a lot of
> monophonic
> > > > > > > samples I'd
> > > > > > > > rather be able to step sequence. That's what annoys me about
> > > > > > > the su700, you
> > > > > > > > don't have a step sequencer display from what I can work
out,
> > > > > > > you can only
> > > > > > > > record in realtime.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What's this new thing Yamaha are coming out with that is
like
> > > > > > > an Rm1x/A3k
> > > > > > > > put together? (more so than the su700 is)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is it very easy to import sequences into the RM1x from a
> > computer?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I've always thought it would be really cool to have a
computer
> > > > > > > based app for
> > > > > > > > a hw-seq that let you chop up midi files and drag them
around
> to
> > > make
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > whole 'program' or whatever it calls it. Anything like this
> > exist
> > > yet?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > nigel
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > on 3/7/00 1:53 AM, Dustin Zahn at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can't you add chords with a external midi keyboard though?
> > > > > > > Back in the day I
> > > > > > > > > got a DJX and I used it to hook up to the RM1x midi for
> doing
> > > > > > > some strings
> > > > > > > > > and such and it works well.
> > > > > > > > > It's also another way to get another set of effects so
> you're
> > > > > > > not stuck with
> > > > > > > > > one variation. But, the DJX isn't worth buying just for
> those
> > > > > > > few things.
> > > > > > > > > Dustin Zahn
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: Paul Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 6:31 AM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Recomendations?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> I got myself a RM1X unit, just last weekend.  It will
thin
> > > > > > > out Controller
> > > > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > >> for, a' la QY70, and is a lot cheaper than the QY700.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> The only downside is that it doesn't have
> > > > > > > auto-accompaniement. As there is
> > > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > >> way of entering chords in directly (eg. C7,Am7 etc.) So
it
> > > > > > > is more suited
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >> techno/dance rather than melodic compositions.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> So far I'm very pleased with it
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Paul K
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> ===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
> > > > > > > > >>> hi there, I just added myself to this list, as I'm in
the
> > > > > > > market for a
> > > > > > > > >>> better hardware sequencer. I thought I'd offer up what
I'm
> > > > > > > looking for,
> > > > > > > > >>> what I'm thinking of getting, and then hopefully getting
> > > > > > > some feedback
> > > > > > > > >>> from some of you...?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> the mainstay of my studio and live rig is my A3000
> sampler.
> > > > > > > I've got 98Mb
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > >>> ram, so I can usually load a whole set at once. other
midi
> > > > > > > things get
> > > > > > > > > used
> > > > > > > > >>> live as well.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I really want something that I can write sequences on
> > > > > > > directly, with a
> > > > > > > > > step
> > > > > > > > >>> sequencer as well as a real-time record function, but
that
> > > > > > > I can also
> > > > > > > > > import
> > > > > > > > >>> sequences easily as midi files from a computer based
> > > > > > > system. I want to be
> > > > > > > > >>> able to do more when I play live than ride sequences, I
> > > > > > > want to be able
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >>> change patterns, tempo, controllers, etc.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I've already got a Yamaha QY-70, which is ok, but kind
of
> > > > > > > limited... I
> > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > >>> to thin out controller data heaps to get more than a
> couple
> > > > > > > of songs in
> > > > > > > > >>> memory, and it's small. I was thinking about trading in
> the
> > > > > > > sampler for
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > >>> SU-700, but there's no envelopes on an SU-700... ;-( So
> now
> > > > > > > I'm tossing
> > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > >>> between an RM1x and a QY-700, and the RM1x seems cheaper
> > > > > > > and possibly
> > > > > > > > >>> better. (i have thought about non-yamaha gear... ;-)
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Any suggestions?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I'm willing to trade in the sampler if I can find a
> > > > > > > performance based
> > > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > >>> that is still a good sampler in it's own right... but
> there
> > > > > > > just doesn't
> > > > > > > > >>> seem to be anything around, so I thought a sequencer
would
> > > > > > > be better.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> ////nigel kersten_____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > >>> |||||
> > > > > > > > >>> ||||                                       - c i n d i
i -
> > > > > > > > >>> |||   http://4trak.net/cindii
> > > > > > > > >>> ||                                          |||||  |||||
> > > |||||
> > > > > > > > >>> |                                        |||||  |||||
> |||||
> > > > > |||||
> > > > > > > > >>> _________synths n beats n stuff\\\\\
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > >> A Message from Paul Kaufman, in sunny Cambridge, England
!
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ////nigel kersten_____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > |||||
> > > > > > > > ||||                                       - c i n d i i -
> > > > > > > > |||   http://4trak.net/cindii
> > > > > > > > ||                                          |||||  |||||
> |||||
> > > > > > > > |                                        |||||  |||||  |||||
> > > |||||
> > > > > > > > _________synths n beats n stuff\\\\\
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to