That's funny.  I do just the opposite. Record patterns into RM1X, than copy
into cubase for further cuttin and pastin....

...marc

----------
>De�: "Dizzy J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Objet�: Re: far fetched
>Date�: Lund 24 juil 2000  15:30
>

> hmm..recording into the rm1x has been no more difficult for me than any
> other sequencer.  I still prefer to record into a computer sequencer for
> ease of editing.  I then move patterns over to the rm1x for playback.
>
> one option you might look at is purchacing a full blown sampler. Im
> currently writing a live set with the rm1x, and access virus, and a yammy
> a3k.  my understanding is that the mpc, while an interesting box, is a
> very good sequencer, with limited sampling.  you already own a very good
> sequencer, and for less money than the MPC you can get very good sampling.
>
> just an idea
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the help.  Much better now. :)  But it still isn't very user
>> friendly for recording, and it doesn't sample.  But Maybe I'll try to save
>> up the money instead of selling the RM1x.  Still want an MPC for sequencing
>> and sampling.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> > the rm1x wont switch at the end of a pattern, but you can make it switch
>> > at the end of a measure.  go into setup and change the value from 1/16 to
>> > 1 measure. give that a try before you sell it.
>> >
>> > the delay he's talking about is when you switch STYLES (i.e what I think
>> > of as songs in pattern mode). I'm planning on getting around that delay
>> > through creative uses of a dj mixer and a burned cd of material.
>> >
>> > > That isn't actually a delay.  It switches patterns instantly.  That's
>> the
>> > > problem.  With my 909 and other gear, when you switch patterns, it goes
>> to
>> > > the new pattern once the current one runs out.  This seems to me to be
>> the
>> > > most logical way in a pattern-based music scene.  I'm actually going to
>> get
>> > > rid of my RM1x because of this fault.  I'm going to get another MPC2000.
>> > >
>> > > Jeff Schmidt
>> > >
>>
>

Reply via email to