Sorry, we have already cleaned that cluster, we need to keep providing service.
But I'm pretty sure the latter `bad split' has overwritten the former's metadata entry, Based on what I remember: select StartRow from METADATA where row >= '3:116.217.49.1' display_timestamps; ??? 3:116.217.49.1 StartRow 116.217.49.1 ??? 3:116.217.49.1 StartRow 116.217.10.39 Donald On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Doug Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Donald, > > Can you post or send me the output of the following two HQL commands: > > select * from METADATA revs=1 display_timestamps; > > and > > select * from METADATA display_timestamps; > > - Doug > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:40 AM, donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Doug, >> >> Today we find a strange problem in one Range Server's log: >> >> $ grep 'Reporting.*sir_ip_index' RangeServer.log | lcat >> [...] >> Tue Dec 2 04:37:42 2008 INFO Hypertable.RangeServer : (/home/pp/src/ >> hypertable/src/cc/Hypertable/RangeServer/Range.cc:559) Reporting newly >> split off range sir_ip_index[116.17.176.112..116.217.10.39] to Master >> Tue Dec 2 04:40:38 2008 INFO Hypertable.RangeServer : (/home/pp/src/ >> hypertable/src/cc/Hypertable/RangeServer/Range.cc:559) Reporting newly >> split off range sir_ip_index[116.217.10.39..116.217.49.1] to Master >> Tue Dec 2 10:24:11 2008 INFO Hypertable.RangeServer : (/home/pp/src/ >> hypertable/src/cc/Hypertable/RangeServer/Range.cc:559) Reporting newly >> split off range sir_ip_index[122.224.30.210..122.5.114.102] to Master >> Wed Dec 3 04:07:42 2008 INFO Hypertable.RangeServer : (/home/pp/src/ >> hypertable/src/cc/Hypertable/RangeServer/Range.cc:559) Reporting newly >> split off range sir_ip_index[116.217.49.1..116.217.49.1] to Master >> >> The second and fourth lines indicate that two ranges with the same end >> row are split off, so they share the same row key in METADATA table, >> and the latter overwrite the former's METADATA record. In this way >> rows bigger than 116.217.10.39 and smaller than 116.217.49.1 become >> unreachable. >> >> It is strange that the last split contains a range with the same start >> row and end row. We reviewed all related code but couldn't find any >> possible reason why this could happen. Do you have any idea? >> >> We have multiple access groups in this sir_ip_index table. >> >> Thanks >> >> Donald >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
