Took a while but here are the numbers:
/opt/hypertable/0.9.2.1/bin/random_write_test 104857600
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
***************************************************
Elapsed time: 3.99 s
Total inserts: 104857
Throughput: 26580963.36 bytes/s
Throughput: 26265.63 inserts/s
/opt/hypertable/0.9.2.1/bin/random_read_test 104857600
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
***************************************************
Elapsed time: 31.82 s
Total scanned: 104857
Throughput: 3334391.97 bytes/s
Throughput: 3294.84 scanned cells/s
I've tried doing a full IPO build but it was taking a lot of hours on
my hardware and in addition there was a linker error at the end of
compilation process. The error was about Hypertable::Logger::set_level
being exposed twice. I didn't figure out this one yet, but for now
doing an intra-procedural optimized builds with intel c++ compiler
10.1 is not possible.
Due to above reasons it took so long to provide these numbers.
I've compiled everything with just -O3 -xT flags, where -xT means icpc
builds code optimized for running on Core 2 processor family.
The hardware these numbers come from is:
Model Name: MacBook Pro 15"
Model Identifier: MacBookPro2,2
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.33 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 667 MHz
The underlying FS was local fs.
Is the random read test result any good?
Mateusz
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hypertable Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
