On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Doug Judd <[email protected]> wrote: > The latest code (commit 2d901102) in the master branch of the hypertable git > [...]
Hey Doug, thanks very much for pushing this out so quickly! I'm now really interested in running multiple RangeServers on each machine since memory being limited and it appears like I have some extra cpu to burn. Does this sound like a reasonable thing to try or does a single RangeServer per machine generally make best use of n cpus as built? I was thinking of starting out with four RangeServers on a 12G/8cpu machine with something like a 2G limit per RS (and tuning hypertable.cfg wherever it assumes configs should be set as per numcpus.) Happily, it looks like you've prepared for this use case by including the port in the naming of /hypertable/servers/* so I thought I'd throw this out there. Cheers, Josh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
