Hi, Doug,

Here is the source code of purge() :

227 int CommitLog::purge(int64_t revision) {
228   ScopedLock lock(m_mutex);
229   CommitLogFileInfo file_info;
230   String fname;
231
232   try {
233
234     while (!m_fragment_queue.empty()) {
235       file_info = m_fragment_queue.front();
236       fname = file_info.log_dir + file_info.num;
237       if (file_info.revision <= revision) {
238         m_fs->remove(fname);
239         m_fragment_queue.pop_front();
240         HT_INFOF("clgc Removed log fragment file='%s' revision=
%lld", fname.c_str(),
241                  (Lld)file_info.revision);
242         if (file_info.purge_log_dir) {
243           HT_INFOF("Removing commit log directory %s",
file_info.log_dir.c_str());
244           m_fs->rmdir(file_info.log_dir);
245         }
246       }
247       else {
248
249         HT_WARNF("clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because %lld >=
%lld (file='%s')",
250                  (Lld)file_info.revision, (Lld)revision,
fname.c_str());
251
252         break;
253       }
254     }
255
256   }
257   catch (Hypertable::Exception &e) {
258     HT_ERRORF("Problem purging log fragment fname = '%s'",
fname.c_str());
259     return e.code();
260   }
261
262   return Error::OK;
263 }
264

When thread execute to LINE 249 & 250, it will break the while loop,
and return from purge(). In another word, It will not pop the fragment
in  m_fragment_queue, and it still there. When purging next time, it
still handle the same fragment, and still break the while loop before
m_fragment_queue.empty().

In this situation, May I understand that there are always some
fragment in the m_fragment_queue which never be purged ???

 -- kuer

On 7月8日, 上午7时54分, Doug Judd <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi kuer,
>
> I don't see any problem with the log snippet that you give below.  The "clgc
> LOG FRAGMENT PURGE" messages are just leftover debugging statements that I
> forgot to remove in a recent checkin.  Are you  experiencing a real problem
> with the database?  If so, what is the symptom?
>
> - Doug
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:48 PM, kuer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I found lots of message in rangeserver's log :
>
> > 2009-07-08 07:30:23,198 1231112512 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> > CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> > 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> > 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> > 2009-07-08 07:30:23,198 1231112512 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> > (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 322964958 bytes
> > 2009-07-08 07:30:43,197 1336011072 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> > (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> > 2009-07-08 07:31:03,198 1199642944 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> > CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> > 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> > 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> > 2009-07-08 07:31:03,198 1199642944 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> > (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> > 2009-07-08 07:31:23,197 1294051648 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> > (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> > 2009-07-08 07:31:43,198 1178663232 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> > CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> > 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> > 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> > 2009-07-08 07:31:43,198 1178663232 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> > (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 324501006 bytes
>
> > It seems that it will be never end.
>
> > I want to know :
> > 1. How this happened? why to purge a future revision?
> > 2. How to resolve/correct this problem?
> >    From the purge() function,  the thread will stop purging if
> > meeting with the 'fucture' revision, and purge() will end.  The
> > 'future' revision data is still there; when purging next time, it will
> > complain it again.
> >    What's the rationale behind this?
> >   Would someone tell me kindly?
>
> >   Thanks.
>
> > -- kuer
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hypertable Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to