Hi Luke, Good point! I've never tried linking dynamic libs. I think moving HqlInterpreter* stuff to a different library is a good idea. IMHO it fits better into HyperTools than Hypertable library.
I can move it there, and will start working on storing output to DFS this week. Mateusz On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > > We might need refactor the code a bit as this creates a circular > dependency between libHypertable and libHyperDfsBroker. Have you tried > to build shared lib version of hypertable out of this? It wouldn't > link in that case. > > We can move HqlInterpreter* stuff into libHyperTools to remove the > circular dependency. Doug and Sanjit, what do you think? > > __Luke > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Mateusz Berezecki <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://github.com/mateuszb/hypertable/commit/f1295603a939ba034927c10d020d763780eb6c22 >> >> Mateusz >> >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
