Hi Raymond, Did you see an actual failure? Or did you just discover this while reviewing the code? Either way, we'll take a look at it, but it would be good to know if you saw a failure here.
- Doug On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Raymond <[email protected]> wrote: > this function destroy_handle in hyperspace master.cc do the > following things: > 1.release lock > 2.grant lock -> grant_pending_lock_reqs(...) > ..... > normally,if the handled be destory hodle the node's lock,that's ok. > While ,if a handle without lock on the node. is destroied, the node's > lock is exist yet. while grant_pending_lock_reqs function is called > yet. the exist lock will be replace . > Maybe i should review the code.but maybe is a bug. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hypertable Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en.
