Okay, i have understood your mean. My application starts multiple threads, per thread uses the synchronous mutator to update sequentially two tables. It looks i need to use the asynchronous mutator in order to improve the writing speed, is it right? BTW, because multiple threads can only share a Hypertable::Client object, if changing multiple threads to multiple processes, whether or not the writing speed can be improved?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
