Hi David, Thanks for the feedback. I removed hypertable-announce <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/hypertable-announce> from the recipient list since this is more of a user mailing list question. Initially we were shying away from large scan queries against the secondary indices, since a fairly innocuous query (e.g. WHERE tag < 'g') could turn out to be very expensive -- worse than a full table scan (copy half of the entire table into a temporary table ordered by the secondary key and scan that temporary table). However, since we've added prefix queries, we may as well just go all the way and add the relational operators and let users learn to be careful. One thing I haven't figured out is what the syntax might look like for relational operators against the *qualifier* index. Do you have any thoughts on that?
- Doug On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:32 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > Congratulation! > I see that the index supports exact match, prefix match and regular > expression match, but it seems not supporting relational operator, such as > less or greater. I want to know when you plan to support relational > operator? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hypertable Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Doug Judd CEO, Hypertable Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
