In a message dated 98-04-12 05:33:33 EDT, you write:
<<
However, the short answer to downloading the files succesfully with a
browser is to use the _right_ mouse button to click on the the filename
or icon (or hold the Shift key while _left_ clicking on it). This will
bring up an option list. Select "save target as" or "save link as".
>>
Thank you for your help. Right clicking the mouse helped me solve the
problem.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 17:26:36 1998
Received: from imo26.mx.aol.com (imo26.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.70])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15193
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo26.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id CQXFa02204
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:26:04 -0500 (EDT)
From: Kurktmk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:26:04 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: COMPANY NOT IN VALUELINE
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
In a message dated 98-04-11 23:29:53 EDT, you write:
<<
You will find Jack Henry & Assoc in the ValueLine expanded edition.
>>
I'm pretty sure I checked the expanded index to look for Jack Henry and
couldn't find it but I will check it out again tomorrow!! thanks.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 17:39:17 1998
Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com (imo15.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.37])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15516
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo15.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id CVRRa02805
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:38:39 -0500 (EDT)
From: Kurktmk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:38:39 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Recent 10Qs
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
In a message dated 98-04-06 19:50:48 EDT, you write:
<< may also wish to try http://www.edgar.whowhere.com. If you give them a
list of the stocks you follow, they will send you an email as soon as the
10Q, 10K, or whatever other form you may request, is available >>
Are you sure this address is correct? I tried to access it today and it kept
giving me an error about unknown address. I double checked the address and I
had it as you type it here. thanks. Should the .com be .gov?
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 18:15:58 1998
Received: from diana.sfsu.edu (diana.sfsu.edu [130.212.10.239])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16147
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:15:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fanny (sfsumetricom4.sfsu.edu [130.212.71.4])
by diana.sfsu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA10713;
Sun, 12 Apr 1998 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 15:23:50 -0700
From: Roxanne Kellam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recent 10Qs
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
Kurktmk wrote:
>
> In a message dated 98-04-06 19:50:48 EDT, you write:
>
> << may also wish to try http://www.edgar.whowhere.com. If you give them a
> list of the stocks you follow, they will send you an email as soon as the
> 10Q, 10K, or whatever other form you may request, is available >>
>
> Are you sure this address is correct? I tried to access it today and it kept
> giving me an error about unknown address. I double checked the address and I
> had it as you type it here. thanks. Should the .com be .gov?
Try
http://www.whowhere.com/Edgar
Roxie Kellam
WOWS
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 18:44:54 1998
Received: from solomon (solomon.ij.net [207.22.166.254])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA16817
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:44:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [209.4.40.59] by solomon (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ua984250
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:43:36 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (16)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:47:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tom Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fiscal year
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
At 10:52 AM 4/12/98 -0400, you wrote:
>I am a newbie using the SSG software after struggling for several months
>with the paper version. I am pleased so far, but I cannot seem to find a
>reliable source to document the fiscal year of a company.
If you use Toolkit V. 3.0, it is explained on page 65.
Regards,
Tom Church
Tampa, FL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 18:46:12 1998
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.34])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16961
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id CZAWa03117
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:45:34 -0500 (EDT)
From: Palfson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:45:34 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: question re china -- clarification on L3?
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
ss5a.better-investing.org id SAA16962
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
I've included the full message I'm replying to at the end of this post,
because I think there is some confusion about L3 . . . . . it may be that
just I am confused, in which case enlightenment from the list is always
welcome!
>From Leni's post, it seems that there is discussion about possibly two
different companies. We've had discussion before on this list about whether
there might be two companies with a similar name. One appears to be written
with a hyphen and one without. It seems one might be an IPO, but the other
just changed the company stock symbol to reflect the newly-formed company so
there may be sufficient history based on the old stock symbol that an SSG
could be done (haven't checked this out). I would hate to see someone purchase
the wrong stock because of confusion with the name so I'm including what I've
found in my internet meanderings and would appreciate confirmation from anyone
who has a better understanding than me.
In the original message Leni talks about L3 Communications going public and
says their ticker is LVLT and they are in partnership with Lockheed, Loral and
a group of investors. I suspect that the company in partnership with Lockheed,
Loral et al may be L-3 Communications Holdings, but that the stock symbol LVLT
belongs to L 3 Communications (Level 3 Communications) which was formed by
Peter Kiewet Sons Inc. (KIWT). I don't think these two are the same.
If you look up L-3 Communications on alert-IPO site
(http://www.ostman.com/alert-ipo/), you get the following basic info:
NAME: L-3 Communications Holdings
SYMBOL: LLL
EXCHANGE: NYSE
CEO: Frank C. Lanza
LOCATION: New York?
INDUSTRY: Instruments
DESCRIPTION: Merchant supplier of sophisticated secure communication systems
and specialized communication products including secure, high data rate
communication systems, microwave components, avionics and ocean systems, and
telemetry, instrumentation and space products.
At www.sec.gov, some of this info seems confirmed when they say "Holdings and
L-3 Communications were formed in April 1997 by Mr. Frank C. Lanza, the former
President and Chief Operating Officer of Loral Corporation."
However, a search on the symbol LLL (symbol given on the Alert-IPO site) at
various sites (including NYSE) brings up no results (except on the NASDAQ site
which returns Campbell Soup as the company for the LLL symbol - figure that
one out!)
A search on the ticker LVLT gives us the information for L3 Communications and
this info is taken from their site (http://www.l3.com/)
NAME: L 3 Communications
SYMBOL: LVLT
EXCHANGE: NASDAQ
CEO: James Q Crowe
LOCATION: Colorado
INDUSTRY: (not listed, but suspect it's Communications Svcs.)
DESCRIPTION: a telecommunications and information services company that has
announced its plans to build and operate advanced fiber networks across the
United States using Internet technology
On the L 3 site they mention that prior to April 1, 1998 the stock symbol was
KIWT (Peter Kiewit SonsÂ’, Inc.) and beginning beginning April 1, 1998, it
became LVLT (Level 3 Communications, Inc.)
The article on the Red Herring site talks about L-3, but doesn't mention a
ticker symbol.
To help resolve the confusion, I've sent an email to the L3 investor relations
department and will let the list know the results.
Peggy Anderson
Women's Investment Network
------------------------------------------original
message-----------------------------------------------------
In a message dated 4/11/98 7:05:07 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> >L3 Communications will be going public around mid-April. It is a
> >partnership
> >among Lockheed, Loral and a group of investors. They manufacture
> >microwave
> >components for cell phone comm towers.
> >They obviously do not fit NAIC criteria, but some may be interested in
> >watching for it.
> >
>
> For anyone still interested in Level 3 Comm (LVLT) they went public 4/1.
> There is an article about them at
>
> redherring.com/insider/1998/0403/level3.html
>
> If incorrect, Red Herring mag, dated 4/2/98
>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 19:06:42 1998
Received: from imo22.mx.aol.com (imo22.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.66])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA17419
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:06:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo22.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id CEKDa02091
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:06:11 -0500 (EDT)
From: StocksJer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:06:11 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: question re china (fwd)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Mac sub 84
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
In a message dated 4/12/98 1:05:07 AM, you wrote:
<<For anyone still interested in Level 3 Comm (LVLT) they went public 4/1.
There is an article about them at
redherring.com/insider/1998/0403/level3.html>>
This is NOT L3 Communications, which has not gone public yet and is a
different industry.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 12 19:12:03 1998
Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com (imo18.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.40])
by ss5a.better-investing.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA17672
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo18.mx.aol.com (IMOv13.ems) id CQHYa22242
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:10:51 -0500 (EDT)
From: StocksJer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 19:10:51 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: question re china -- clarification on L3?
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Mac sub 84
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
ss5a.better-investing.org id TAA17675
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2. 4 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
In a message dated 4/12/98 10:50:13 PM, you wrote:
<<I'm replying to at the end of this post,
because I think there is some confusion about L3 >>
Peggy-
You are correct, they are two different companies. L3 is expected to go
public in mid-April and is not connected with Peter Kiewit SonsÂ’, Inc.
Jerry
