The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:

The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the
beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an
obsolescent feature.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c |    4 ++--
 include/linux/i2c.h             |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c
index be99c02..b03af56 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct pmcmsptwi_data {
 };
 
 /* The default settings */
-const static struct pmcmsptwi_clockcfg pmcmsptwi_defclockcfg = {
+static const struct pmcmsptwi_clockcfg pmcmsptwi_defclockcfg = {
        .standard = {
                .filter = 0x3,
                .clock  = 0x1f,
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ const static struct pmcmsptwi_clockcfg 
pmcmsptwi_defclockcfg = {
        },
 };
 
-const static struct pmcmsptwi_cfg pmcmsptwi_defcfg = {
+static const struct pmcmsptwi_cfg pmcmsptwi_defcfg = {
        .arbf           = 0x03,
        .nak            = 0x03,
        .add10          = 0x00,
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 76014f8..2d1c608 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ I2C_CLIENT_MODULE_PARM(probe, "List of adapter,address 
pairs to scan "      \
                       "additionally");                                 \
 I2C_CLIENT_MODULE_PARM(ignore, "List of adapter,address pairs not to " \
                       "scan");                                         \
-const static struct i2c_client_address_data addr_data = {              \
+static const struct i2c_client_address_data addr_data = {              \
        .normal_i2c     = normal_i2c,                                   \
        .probe          = probe,                                        \
        .ignore         = ignore,                                       \
-- 
1.5.4.1


_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to