Hi Marco,

> I did the fixes you pointed out and run the script.
> This is the result.

Thanks. This patch is somehow missing the i2c-algo-pca.h changes.

> +     adap->algo = &pca_algo;
> +
> +     if (pca_data->i2c_chip_type > I2C_PCA_CHIP_9665) {

I wonder if something like I2C_PCA_CHIP_MAXVAL could be useful here.
Then, if another chip will be added, you just need changes in the .h
file.

> +             printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Invalid chip selected."
> +                             "Assuming PCA9564.\n", adap->name);
> +             pca_data->i2c_chip_type = I2C_PCA_CHIP_9564;
>       }
>  
> -     adap->algo = &pca_algo;
> +     if (pca_data->i2c_chip_type == I2C_PCA_CHIP_9564) {
> +             static int freqs[] = {330, 288, 217, 146, 88, 59, 44, 36};
> +             int clock;
> +
> +             if (pca_data->i2c_clock > 7) {
> +                     switch (pca_data->i2c_clock) {
> +                     case 330000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_330kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 288000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_288kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 217000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_217kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 146000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_146kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 88000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_88kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 59000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_59kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 44000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_44kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     case 36000:
> +                             pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_36kHz;
> +                             break;
> +                     default:
> +                             printk(KERN_WARNING
> +                                     "%s: Invalid I2C clock speed selected."
> +                                     "Trying default.\n", adap->name);

Please mention what the default is.

> +                     pca_data->i2c_clock = I2C_PCA_CON_59kHz;
> +                     }
> +             } else {
> +                     printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: "
> +                             "Choosing the clock frequency based on "
> +                             "index is deprecated."
> +                             " Use the nominal frequency.\n", adap->name);
> +             }
> +
> +             pca_reset(pca_data);
> +
> +             clock = pca_clock(pca_data);
> +             DEB1(KERN_INFO "%s: Clock frequency is %dkHz\n",
> +                  adap->name, freqs[clock]);
> +
> +             pca_set_con(pca_data, I2C_PCA_CON_ENSIO | clock);
> +     } else {
> +             int clock;
> +             int mode;
> +             int tlow, thigh;
> +             int min_tlow, min_thigh;
> +             int raise_fall_time;
> +
> +             struct i2c_algo_pca_data *pca_data = adap->algo_data;
> +
> +             /* Ignore the reset function from the module,
> +              * we can use the parallel bus reset
> +              */
> +             pca_data->reset_chip = pca9665_reset;
> +
> +             if (pca_data->i2c_clock > 1265800) {
> +                     printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: I2C clock speed too high."
> +                             " Using 1265.8kHz.\n", adap->name);
> +                     pca_data->i2c_clock = 1265800;
> +             }
> +
> +             if (pca_data->i2c_clock < 60300) {
> +                     printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: I2C clock speed too low."
> +                             " Using 60.3kHz.\n", adap->name);
> +                     pca_data->i2c_clock = 60300;
> +             }
> +
> +             clock = pca_clock(pca_data)/100; /* Hz*100 */

CodingStyle (no spaces around operators)
The comment is also a bit misleading as it is the opposite from the
code. Please be a bit more detailed here.

>  
> -     pca_reset(pca_data);
>  
> -     clock = pca_clock(pca_data);
> -     DEB1(KERN_INFO "%s: Clock frequency is %dkHz\n", adap->name, 
> freqs[clock]);
> +             if (pca_data->i2c_clock > 10000) {
> +                     mode = I2C_PCA_MODE_TURBO;
> +                     min_tlow = 14;
> +                     min_thigh  = 5;
> +                     raise_fall_time = 22; /* Raise 11e-8s, Fall 11e-8s */
> +             } else if (pca_data->i2c_clock > 4000) {
> +                     mode = I2C_PCA_MODE_FASTP;
> +                     min_tlow = 17;
> +                     min_thigh  = 9;
> +                     raise_fall_time = 22; /* Raise 11e-8s, Fall 11e-8s */
> +             } else if (pca_data->i2c_clock > 1000) {
> +                     mode = I2C_PCA_MODE_FAST;
> +                     min_tlow = 44;
> +                     min_thigh  = 20;
> +                     raise_fall_time = 58; /* Raise 29e-8s, Fall 29e-8s */
> +             } else {
> +                     mode = I2C_PCA_MODE_STD;
> +                     min_tlow = 157;
> +                     min_thigh  = 134;
> +                     raise_fall_time = 127; /* Raise 29e-8s, Fall 98e-8s */
> +             }
> +
> +             if (clock < 648) {
> +                     tlow = 255;
> +                     thigh = (1000000-clock*raise_fall_time)/(3*clock)-tlow;

CodingStyle (no spaces around operators)
The values look a bit magic. I could find min_t*-values in the spec,
still a reference to the section of the spec will be helpful. I think
you could elaborate a bit more on raise_fall_time and clock < 648,
though.

> +             } else {
> +                     tlow = ((1000000-clock*raise_fall_time)*min_tlow);
> +                     tlow /= (3*clock*(min_thigh+min_tlow));
> +                     thigh = tlow*min_thigh/min_tlow;
> +             }

CodingStyle (no spaces around operators)

> +
> +             pca_reset(pca_data);
>  
> -     pca_set_con(pca_data, I2C_PCA_CON_ENSIO | clock);
> +             DEB1(KERN_INFO
> +                  "%s: Clock frequency is %dHz\n", adap->name, clock*100);

CodingStyle (no spaces around operators)

> +
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_INDPTR, I2C_PCA_IMODE);
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_IND, mode);
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_INDPTR, I2C_PCA_ISCLL);
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_IND, tlow);
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_INDPTR, I2C_PCA_ISCLH);
> +             pca_outw(pca_data, I2C_PCA_IND, thigh);
> +
> +             pca_set_con(pca_data, I2C_PCA_CON_ENSIO);
> +     }
>       udelay(500); /* 500 us for oscilator to stabilise */
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -384,7 +508,7 @@
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "
>       "Wolfram Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C-Bus PCA9564 algorithm");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C-Bus PCA9564/PCA9665 algorithm");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  
>  module_param(i2c_debug, int, 0);
> diff -ur linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-isa.c 
> linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-isa.c
> --- linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-isa.c   2008-09-08 
> 14:40:20.000000000 -0300
> +++ linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-isa.c       2008-09-19 
> 12:27:51.000000000 -0300
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
>  
>  /* Data sheet recommends 59kHz for 100kHz operation due to variation
>   * in the actual clock rate */
> -static int clock  = I2C_PCA_CON_59kHz;
> +static int clock  = 59000;
> +static int chip   = I2C_PCA_CHIP_9564;
>  
>  static wait_queue_head_t pca_wait;
>  
> @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@
>       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>       .id             = I2C_HW_A_ISA,
>       .algo_data      = &pca_isa_data,
> -     .name           = "PCA9564 ISA Adapter",
> +     .name           = "PCA9564/PCA9665 ISA Adapter",
>       .timeout        = 100,
>  };
>  
> @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     pca_isa_data.i2c_chip_type = chip;
>       pca_isa_data.i2c_clock = clock;
>       if (i2c_pca_add_bus(&pca_isa_ops) < 0) {
>               dev_err(dev, "Failed to add i2c bus\n");
> @@ -182,7 +184,7 @@
>  }
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ISA base PCA9564 driver");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ISA base PCA9564/PCA9665 driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  
>  module_param(base, ulong, 0);
> @@ -191,7 +193,15 @@
>  module_param(irq, int, 0);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq, "IRQ");
>  module_param(clock, int, 0);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(clock, "Clock rate as described in table 1 of PCA9564 
> datasheet");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(clock, "Clock rate in hertz.\n\t\t"
> +             "For PCA9564: 330000,288000,217000,146000,"
> +             "88000,59000,44000,36000\n"
> +             "\t\tFor PCA9665:\tStandard: 60300 - 100099\n"
> +             "\t\t\t\tFast: 100100 - 400099\n"
> +             "\t\t\t\tFast+: 400100 - 10000099\n"
> +             "\t\t\t\tTurbo: Up to 1265800");
> +module_param(chip, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(chip, "Chip type: 0 = PCA9564; 1 - PCA9665");
>  
>  module_init(pca_isa_init);
>  module_exit(pca_isa_exit);
> diff -ur linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c 
> linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c
> --- linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c      2008-09-08 
> 14:40:20.000000000 -0300
> +++ linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c  2008-09-19 
> 12:28:36.000000000 -0300
> @@ -172,8 +172,9 @@
>  
>       i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id >= 0 ? pdev->id : 0;
>       i2c->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> -     snprintf(i2c->adap.name, sizeof(i2c->adap.name), "PCA9564 at 0x%08lx",
> -             (unsigned long) res->start);
> +     snprintf(i2c->adap.name, sizeof(i2c->adap.name),
> +              "PCA9564/PCA9665 at 0x%08lx",

I think we could be precise here as we know the chip-type. I just got
the idea: Do you think it is possible to detect the chip type at
runtime? Perhaps by somehow checking the presence of the indirect
register?

> +              (unsigned long) res->start);
>       i2c->adap.algo_data = &i2c->algo_data;
>       i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>       i2c->adap.timeout = platform_data->timeout;
> @@ -246,7 +247,7 @@
>  e_alloc:
>       release_mem_region(res->start, res_len(res));
>  e_print:
> -     printk(KERN_ERR "Registering PCA9564 FAILED! (%d)\n", ret);
> +     printk(KERN_ERR "Registering PCA9564/PCA9665 FAILED! (%d)\n", ret);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -290,7 +291,7 @@
>  }
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Wolfram Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C-PCA9564 platform driver");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C-PCA9564/PCA9665 platform driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  
>  module_init(i2c_pca_pf_init);
> diff -ur linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig 
> linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.26.5/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig 2008-09-08 14:40:20.000000000 
> -0300
> +++ linux-2.6.26.5-new/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig     2008-09-19 
> 10:33:35.000000000 -0300
> @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
>         will be called i2c-voodoo3.
>  
>  config I2C_PCA_ISA
> -     tristate "PCA9564 on an ISA bus"
> +     tristate "PCA9564/PCA9665 on an ISA bus"
>       depends on ISA
>       select I2C_ALGOPCA
>       default n
> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@
>         time).  If unsure, say N.
>  
>  config I2C_PCA_PLATFORM
> -     tristate "PCA9564 as platform device"
> +     tristate "PCA9564/PCA9665 as platform device"
>       select I2C_ALGOPCA
>       default n
>       help

> _______________________________________________
> i2c mailing list
> i2c@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

I haven't really applied the patch yet. Will do on Monday when I have
access to the PCA9564-equipped board.

All the best,

   Wolfram

-- 
  Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to