On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 02:03 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > This is the original mail.... > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/13/290 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/12/8 > > I can't find the ones patching i2c. > > Well, I didn't disagree with the change. I think this is good change > (and good catch, btw). > > Just mention it in the patch description (or better yet, you could send > a separate patch for this particular issue, it seems quite serious).
Yes, it should most definitely be a separate patch. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
