Paul, Thank you very much for your team’s continuous work to progress the I2NSF.
With regard to the I2NSF Applicability draft, IANA has a review issue: IANA has issues with the text of the IANA Considerations section of the document. I don’t think you need any action by IANA. Can you please ask IANA if it is due to your draft doesn’t have the section on IANA Considerations? All drafts are required to have a section on IANA consideration, like below: IANA Considerations None Linda From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 11:40 AM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; skku-iotlab-members <[email protected]>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Subject: Revision Plan for I2NSF Capability Data Model and Consumer-Facing Interface Drafts Hi Linda and Yoav, My SKKU team are working for the revision of I2NSF Capability Data Model and Consumer-Facing Interface Drafts. For the I2NSF Capability Data Model draft, I am addressing Roman Danyliw's comments. For the Consumer-Facing Interface Data Model draft, my student (Patrick) and I have revised it according to Jan Lindblad's comments (YANG Doctor). We are doublechecking our revision before asking Jan to review our revision. We will post both the drafts next Monday before the I-D cut-off time. For the I2NSF Applicability draft, the editing takes a long time before the publication as an RFC. Could you ask an RFC editor to finish the editing of the I2NSF Applicability draft soon? Thanks. Best Regards, Paul
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
