Roman:
This is an example of the hurdles placed in front of any Yang model. During the original creation gathering of information for the yang model, quic was not even a protocol. Cheers, Sue From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 5:58 AM To: Roman Danyliw Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Zahed's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model Hi Roman, Patrick and I will think of how to support QUIC in the I2NSF Capability Data Model even though such a support of QUIC seems not to be straightforward. Thanks. Paul On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:42 PM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> wrote: Hi! I've been working on getting the ADs to clear their DISCUSSes on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model (and not worried about COMMENTs right now). In chatting with Zahed: ** Per DISCUSS#1, he still wants to see the QUIC language her noted (per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/LdSfbPOx4GVqL0fPP6I1rpuMANg/). That isn't in -26. ** He has confirmed that his DISCUSS#2 (on VoLTE) is resolved in -26. Thanks. ** Per DISCUSS#3, he would clear his DISCUSS on disclaimer language similar to QUIC on HTTP/3. Thanks, Roman
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
