On 24/03/2022 07:38, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote:
Hi I2NSF WG,
As you know, our I2NSF WG will discuss the I2NSF Re-Chartering
at IETF-113 I2NSF WG Session today.
I attach the text of the re-chartering as pdf and txt files.
Those that have worked on the current five I2NSF I-D will know that they
do not subscribe to the basic tenet of 'reference not replicate' and in
doing so have created many issues of lack of coherence (some of which
have been resolved, some of which may never be resolved) and have
created much additional work. In a sense, the current work is built on
foundations of sand, which may or may not support ongoing work.
What is needed, and for me it is the overwhelming priority, before any
new models are crafted, is a 'common' I-D to reduce or eliminate this
replication even if it cannot be applied immediately to those five I-D.
The current charter hints at the need for this in its bullets and in
its list of deliverables. The terminology draft might have done this
but has gone in a slightly different direction. Common YANG capability
statements are an obvious example but even a common base of plain text
would make the work simpler, less error-prone.
Tom Petch
Our five core I2NSF YANG data model drafts are almost completed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Capability YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-27
2. NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-22
3. Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-16
4. Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-17
5. Registration Interface YANG Data Model
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-15
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The three of them (i.e., 1, 2, and 3) got the feedback of the IESG and
the revisions have been sent to the IESG reviewers.
The remaining two (i.e., 4, 5) are well-synchronized with the others.
I will present the updates of them today's I2NSF WG.
I attach the slides for them for your easy checking.
Our AD Roman has concerns about the low energy of our I2NSF WG for the new
work items in the I2NSF Re-chartering.
Could you speak up your voice about your comments, interest, and support of
our I2NSF Re-Chartering?
See you online at IETF-113 I2NSF WG Session today.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
