Hi Roman, I have reflected your comments on the revision of the I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-27#page-80
Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 5:16 AM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm > which largely resolved IESG feedback. > > I'm going to ask for few more editorial fixes: > > (1) (from idnits) > > -- The abstract seems to contain references > ([I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]), which it shouldn't. Please > replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in > question. > > I response to IESG feedback I believe a reference was added into the > abstract. Please revert to the earlier text which had not reference. > > -- Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location has been published > as RFC 9179 > > (2) In response to Éric Vyncke's ballot, references to an information > model were removed. There is one more place in the introduction to Section > 4 where this still needs to be done. > > I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised > I-D Needed". > > Again, thanks for all of the work here. > Roman > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
