Hi Murray! > -----Original Message----- > From: I2nsf <i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via > Datatracker > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 1:50 AM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-mo...@ietf.org; Linda > Dunbar <dunbar...@gmail.com>; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf- > monitoring-data-model-15: (with COMMENT) > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The shepherd writeup indicates that there is an IPR declaration, > but does not characterize the discussion about it that occurred > (if any). Please update the writeup to state, or at least let the > IESG know by replying to this, what the outcome of this was.
Please see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/pTemuXK-AURK99SCJ8cZ-5L3mhI/. There was an IPR discussion collectively across all of the I2NSF YANG documents. The IPR holder actually modified their terms based on WG feedback. Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
