+1 AB
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) < [email protected]> wrote: > Or May be some thing like Control Plane interface (CPi) and Data > Forwarding/Forwarder interface (DFi)?. > > -Nagendra > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Noel Chiappa > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [i2rs] Progressing the chartering effort > > > From: "Zach Seils (seils)" <[email protected]> > > > What about simple "control interface" and "data interface" > designations? > > "Control interface" I like. I'm a lot less sold on "data interface" - it > sonuds like some sort of programmatic thing, rather that (usually) a piece > of hardware over which user data packets are sent. > > 'Physical interface' for the latter is probably not optimal, now that I > think about it; we probably want to support virtual interfaces as well. How > about 'network interface', though? > > Noel > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
