I have no shadow of a doubt that you can define what needs to be defined.

I am however very interested to see that I2RS WG members will agree on
those things seamlessly :)

R.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Yi Yang (yiya) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/14/13 10:44 AM, "Russ White" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>No, but I did try to address at least a partial list in one of the use
>>cases draft. I think this would really entail building a data model for
>>"the entity officially known as the rib." Is the current YANG model a
>>good solution to the question? It seems like we should answer that
>>question before writing another one.
>
> There is a current YANG draft trying to cover the most basic of a routing
> table
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/?include_text
> =1
>
>>
>>I suspect we'll need either need to extend an existing ones to get where
>>we want?
>>
>>
>>I think the right place to start might be to explicitly include the
>>objects that need to be manipulated in each use case.
>>
>>Maybe we need a "standard set" of things that need to be included in each
>>use case?
>>
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
> "Cast a wide net for every possible use case" and "Narrow requirements to
> bite sized chunks"
>
> The same principal can be used to define the RIB as well.:-) Start with a
> vanilla RIB definition consisting of basic common objects, but allow it to
> be extended for fancy applications.
>
> Yi
>
>
>>
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Russ
>>
>>
>><><
>>[email protected]
>>[email protected]
>>
>>On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>>> Why do we need to go beyond defining an interface to the RIB to make
>>>>your
>>>> use case work?
>>>
>>> I am talking precise about that definition of RIB interface. Not how
>>> the RIB works in given vendor of network element. That is
>>> implementation detail.
>>>
>>> Basically a list of values one can write or read to/from RIB. Have you
>>> seen any document with such list yet ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> R.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> i2rs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>>_______________________________________________
>>i2rs mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to