If others in the WG agree with you, presumably the chairs will direct
that and we will do so.
Having tried to work on a single document, it seemed to us to be MUCH
cleaner to have two separate ones.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/17/15 2:34 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:04:22PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
Juergen:
Normally, I would agree with you. However, these environmental security
issues are not directed at the I2RS protocol but the environment. I thought
it would be clearer to have this split so the I2RS protocol development work
would not need to considered these hard requirements for the protocol.
I reviewed both documents before the last IETF meeting and I believe
one document is all that is needed.
/js
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
