The deprecation of <get> and the addition of <get-state> lead me to
conclude that you were moving to a paradigm of different RPCs for
different data stores, rather than a paradigm of a datastore parameter
for the RPC.
I may well have over-generalized from what I read.
Yours,
Joel
On 6/1/16 2:34 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:27:17PM -0400, Joel Halpern Direct wrote:
I think this may be following the paradigm in Juergen's draft, where
accessing data <get...> and <set...> in different data stores uses different
RPCs? Is that your intent?
Joel,
which part of my I-D made you believe this is the case? Several core
NETCONF RPCs do take a datastore as an argument and this is just fine.
/js
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
