On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:50:28PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > I understood the proposed text as 'be able to determine whether the > protocol implementation supports the mechanisms required by I2RS', > which is different from 'needing a reliable communication channel'.
+1 Whether this is simply considered a profile of netconf/restconf is fine, in my opinion. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
