Works for me! Sue
-----Original Message----- From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:56 AM To: Joe Clarke; Susan Hares; 'Russ White'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral) That text works for me. Thanks, Joel On 7/20/16 8:52 AM, Joe Clarke wrote: > On 7/20/16 07:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >> The text I comment to says "individual ephemeral configuration >> changes" - I was not able to infer from this that it was supposed to >> imply "individual I2RS clients". > > I agree with both you and Joel. "Individual" should apply to clients, > but we need to have something that ties priority to local config. > > What about: > > Req-07: Local configuration MUST have a priority that is comparable > with individual I2RS client priorities for making changes. This > priority will determine whether local configuration changes or > individual ephemeral configuration changes take precedence as described in RFC7921. > The I2RS protocol MUST support his mechanism. > > Joe > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
