This document appears to me to accurately reflect the working group agreed requirements. It also appears to be a a clear and effective statement of these requirements, which I support.

Thus, I support publication of this document as an RFC.

Yours,
Joel

On 8/2/16 9:18 AM, Susan Hares wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-i2rs-ephemeral-state-15.txt.  This
draft received a “hum” of consensus at IETF 96, and we are now taking
the final text to a WG Last Call.  Please send your comments on the
requirements to the WG list.



Sue Hares and Russ White



_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to