> What would be the semantics of such NH? > Don't use for forwarding at all? Don't use for forwarding within ECMP bunde? > Don't use in ECMP but use otherwise?
"Don't use as a next hop in an ECMP bundle but use otherwise..." The problem I'm having (to answer Joel's follow on question) is this isn't really a "route," but specific to a particular route that's being used (even if connected) as a next hop -- so it's not really a new "next hop" type, I don't think... Rather, it would be a way to override the use of an existing route for recursion by other routes -- I don't know if this is possible in the current models. Thoughts? :-) Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
