Hello Alia,
Thank you for your comments. Re: 1, we are happy to take the reference out. We felt that it would be useful to have it for explanatory reasons to delineate it from other efforts, but do not feel strongly about it. Re: 2, I am re-reading it and yes, the description is indeed contradictory. We will take out the corresponding sentence. Thanks --- Alex From: Alia Atlas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 1:55 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-09. First I would like to thank the authors, Alex, Jan, Hari, Nitin, Robert, & Xufeng, for their work on a very nicely written document. I do see that there are 6 authors. I am open to hearing why and how each author has and will continue to be an active participant - including through AUTH48, but this is higher than the normal limit. I am requesting that IETF Last Call start and have scheduled this for the IESG telechat on Jan 5, 2017. I do have a few minor comments below: 1) Section 5 mentions I-D.draft-acee-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend. Since this is an individual draft, it's probably better not to include it as a reference. 2) On p. 25-26, in list link description: "Layering dependencies on links in underlay topologies are not represented, as the layering information of nodes and of termination points is sufficient." This seems to contradict earlier text and the exice of the list supporting link that is immediately after. Could you please clean up or clarify? Regards, Alia
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
