Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two high level comments (please note that I’m not a yang expert and if this model is considered right by the vendor community that want to use it, I’m fine with it): 1) I’m not sure about the usefulness of the flag attribute, given that’s a very general reference to some kind of unspecified information (and it’s also not used in the examples as far as I can see) 2) Why are the is-is and ospf models only given as examples instead of also specifying them completely in this draft. These parts atually seem to me to be the more interesting bits of work… _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
