Sue:
The implication of that statement is that actual implementations (like
ODL etc) now
need to copy/paste this model without the I2RS text to use them in other ways.
This seems
strange and just about the most inefficient way to use these that I can think
of.
—Tom
> On Jan 24, 2017:12:50 PM, at 12:50 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Anton:
>
> See earlier message to Martin. Topology models are I2RS YANG Models
> designed for ephemeral state with specific security concerns. This is not
> your basic YANG model no matter which data store ephemeral gets linked to.
> Where is ephemeral state? By IESG Design of charter, I2RS is not in charge
> of defining ephemeral state solution. NETMOD/NETCONF are. Go ask them.
>
> Do not blame the messenger echoing NETMOD results,
>
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anton Ivanov
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
>
> On 24/01/17 11:52, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> Susan,
>>
>> so are these YANG models regular YANG models or are these YANG models
>> specific to the yet to be defined I2RS protocol and yet to be defined
>> datastores?
>>
>> I think this is the core of Martin's and my question. A simple clear
>> and concise answer would be nice.
>
> +1.
>
> A.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
