> On 25 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:07:45AM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote: >> >> So - if one has models - such as a writable topology - where there >> can be dependencies on dynamic data, then those models can't be in >> the configuration data-store as currently defined. >> > > Yes
but isn’t this confusing models and implementation? if you have a case where you have a dependency on dynamic data then you can’t put that instantiation of the model in the configuration data-store. but if your implementation never depends on dynamic data then it ought to be fine. or again am I missing something obvious? more to the point. Alia - what’s the dependency on dynamic data that you’re concerned about? Giles > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
