Joe Clarke writes: >Additionally, if the revised DS draft progresses (and it seems like it will), >do >we need <write-data> at all? Yes, we need to sort out validation, but why >can't >we use <edit-config> (revised DS already gives us <get-data>).
<edit-config> is defined in the base NETCONF spec, and we're trying to avoid reving that. Instead we're proposing edits to dynamic datastores (like i2rs-defined ones) will be performed using a new <edit-data> operation (patterned after <edit-config>, named to mirror <get-data>). This operation will take an argument to indicate the target datastore. Following the outcome of Tuesday NETCONF meeting, we'll be preparing individual drafts for NETCONF and RESTCONF based on the "impact to ..." sections that are currently in the datastore draft. (Those sections will be removed from the datastore draft.) And based on Sue's comments, we'll be adding more details re: dynamic datastores to the datastore draft. Thanks, Phil _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
