Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding the version 18, please engage in the discussion with Qin Wu (OPS DIR reviewer). He has some good questions. Below is my feedback on version 16, which has not been addressed. Preliminary note: I hope I'm doing the right thing by updating my ballot as I understand that the document is back to the WG. However, since I reviewed the versions 15 and 16, since some of my ballot points have been addressed (thank you), and since I wanted to share my feedback publicly, here is my feedback. Editorial: The data model obeys the requirements for the ephemeral state found in the document [I-D.draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state]. For ephemeral topology data that is system controlled, the process tasked with maintaining topology information will load information from the routing process (such as OSPF) into the <operational> without relying on a configuration datastore. <operational> => operational state datastore, according to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores/ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
