Jie and Lada: I've recently listened to the I2RS meeting in IETF 101.
Chris Hopps asked about the notifications in L2. He was asking about a more general use of the notification that might be useful in the I'm not really sure how to approach responding to his operational request - since it really impacts all topology models. My inclination is to push this draft through into RFC usage, and then to work through a "-bis" functionality. Jie - would you ask the individuals pushing for L2 model if that works for them. Lada - would you ask the Yang doctors if this is the right approach to take. Of course, this might be easier if we had versioning instead of a model name change. Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 10:09 PM To: Ladislav Lhotka; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-04 Hi Lada, Thanks a lot for your review comments. Please see some replies inline: > -----Original Message----- > From: Ladislav Lhotka [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 9:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Yangdoctors early review of > draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-04 > > Reviewer: Ladislav Lhotka > Review result: Ready > > This draft and YANG modules contained therein fit into the framework > of I2RS network topology models. I have no substantial comments, from > the YANG point of view this document is ready to be published. > > Comments and questions: > > 1. What is the purpose of the 'flag-type' type and 'flag-identity' identity? > There are no identities derived from the latter. The "flag-type" type is used in the grouping "l2-network-attributes", "l2-node-attributes" and "l2-link-attributes". While there is no identities derived from the "flag-identity", it is used in the typedef flag-type. Is this OK? > 2. Some descriptions overuse capitalization. For example, instead of 'VLAN Name' > I would suggest 'VLAN name'. Thanks for catching this. Will fix in next revision. > 3. An example of an instance document in an appendix would be very helpful. Thanks for your suggestion. We will add an example to the appendix. Best regards, Jie _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
