-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/01/14 13:26, Mateusz Poszwa wrote: > IMHO, that would be inconsistent. I'd say either the former or „ if > (con->window != NULL && con->window->name != NULL) ” Right. I misread it.
> I find it less readable, so I vote for leaving it as it is now. Too > much purism may be harmful. ;-) I would be just as happy to remove all the != NULLs as adding them, even if I prefer explicit checking. Regards, an advocate of strongly typed languages - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlLqSq0ACgkQRtClrXBQc7VnpgD/QAt620WGU6HzcOKhPSh+fTDE mYRiriTlFEWagqOcwZoA/2HZle1u33jMpR87nhbctmUH1VanwB68RWMNRG41dANF =/79A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
