I think the fact no source code is available might cause a problem for it getting into Main... thats not necessarily such a bad thing though. Edubuntu addon packages will definitely go to universe, its just a question of when. The only difference is, no direct downstream support. But as I understand it this support will come from mostly upstream anyway, and there are a couple of ubuntu devs on upstream anyway.
Or am I missing something, is there some reason we absolutely must have Canonical support for squeak? David On 11/7/08, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > additionaly to what Bert said: > > to summarize _my understanding_ again: there is source, there is just no > ascii > representation of the source / you cannot compile the source to binaries. > Because the source comes as blobs (being the VM in it's state), which can be > edited inside the virtual machine it represents. > > In theory squeak can be bootstrapped, in practice not. > > (Hence, there is a chicken and egg problem. (For non squeak developers. > Squeak > developers are used to this and happy about it.)) > > > regards, > > Holger > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
